Tag Archives: pitchcoach

2018. No leadership. No insight. No hope.

England were never going to win this pitch. They never had a prayer and anyone who followed things from the start knew this. As did the media who, nevertheless, enjoyed raising the temperature with a ‘we was robbed by the bunging-corrupt-lieing-cheating-FIFA story. At least it kept the snow off the front pages. Here are two real reasons why we lost.  Lack of leadership. Lack of insight.

_45086349_triesman_av512

Think what you will about the preening Sebb Blatter but recognise that he and his cronies, like the IOC,  are all powerful.  They are not impressed by titles and are used to world leaders grovelling. Obama early in his presidency lost prestige pitching for Chicago to host 2012. The same goes for the ill-advised Cameron. The patent lack of clear leadership from England’s bid, at its conspicuous worst with Lord Triesman and his pillow talk, was a fatal own goal. 

putin

Compare this with the Russian bid. Whoever was nominally leading their delegation, the real leadership was one man, Putin. From the outset FIFA  knew with total certainty who they were dealing with and who would and could deliver. (No client in any pitch appoints where leadership is lacking!)  Seb Coe was clearly the leader of London’s Olympic bid.

article-1291213564444-0c4b723a000005dc-497652_636x300

 The Dave, David and William charm team complains that it is unfair, “our technical bid was the best”. They forget that Paris, who were the  technically superior bid for 2012, lost because they lacked insight into what really mattered to the IOC, a  need to be seen as good guys inspiring the world’s youth.  London played to this.(See last post).

sepp_blatter_wideweb__470x33001

The FA’s lack of strategic insight was neatly expressed by Jeff Powell in the  Daily Mail: “Not until it was so late that the doomsday clock was chiming did it dawn on any of them that what FIFA really wanted was to bestow its greatest gift not upon the rich, smug and famous but on a region in need of those five star facilities….and in so doing open up a vast new frontier for the global game.”

The steppes of Russia were always going to have more allure than football crowded England.

“PAINT A MOOD”.

On BBC2 yesterday evening, in ‘JFK-The Making of Modern Politics’, Andrew Marr discussed the 1960 presidential campaign. Most of us know  about the famous television debate when the unshaven, sweating Nixon lost the viewer vote. However there was much more to a campaign that started out with Kennedy as the rank outsider, known to less than half the population.

jfk2

To win he pioneered ideas now common to most political campaigns. He put style ahead of substance, he portrayed his enviable life style, he spent huge amounts of money and he was ruthless when needed. All this worked for him. But perhaps the most telling of Marr’s observations was this. He said that JFK  knew how to “paint a mood”.

He did not get bogged down in detail and policy statements. When he met voters he talked to them as individuals, he listened to them and above all created a sense of promise that anything seemed possible. “His vigour, his  vibrancy and his cheerful optimism made them feel hopeful, energised, enthused and… interested”.

 Next time, paint a mood!

A team needs to be seen as a team.

One of the great things about a pitch is  the  heightened sense of excitement. A challenge  outside day-to-day routine, the stimulus of competition, working  to meet  an impossible deadline and the anticipation of performing on the big day. All inspire teamwork.

charles-schulz-peanuts-teamwork12

However achieving teamwork is not the problem. Being seen to be a team can be and that matters.

 The rational evaluation of track record, proposed solution, fee strucure and so on, is not what dictates most decisions.  It is the emotional judgement of three questions, all of which are an instinctive response to the pitch team. How hungry are they? Do I like them? Do they like each other?

It is this last question that is often overlooked. Just because a team has burnt the midnight oil together does not mean they will be seen as a team in the pitch. A succession of well learnt, well scripted  set pieces, each relevant to individual roles can be seen as just that. A collection of individuals rather than a team.

The solution is simple. Rehearse as a team working on spontaneuos interaction, introduce  story telling that informally sends out team signals. Have an observer in rehearsals  charged only with seeing you as a team.

Pitching wisdom from Dave Trott.

 This well written post appeared on Dave Trott’s Blog recently. Anyone interested in pitching should read it. Several times.

“I went to a NABS talk the other evening.
Helen Calcraft and Martin Jones were speaking about new business.
Pitching, to be specific.
What was interesting was the difference between the male and female presentation.
Martin talked first.
He’d been the head of the AAR, the people that handle around 50% of all new business pitches.
So Martin knows what he’s talking about.
He put up lots of useful facts and pointers, lots of tips.
He’d seen just about every agency pitching over the years.
He analysed what worked, and why, what to do, and what not.
Each chart had an interesting line of useful of information.
All the men in the audience were nodding along, taking it in.
Then Helen Calcraft spoke.
And as she talked you felt the room shift.
All the women came to life.
Helen is the founder of MCBD.
She’s also the most successful new business person in London.
Helen’s presentation was much less about the facts and much more about the emotions.
Helen went through the experience of pitching in a way that brought it to life.
First she described the whole process like this.
“Each client is like a superstar.
Immediately they announce their business is up for pitch, every agency in town will be all over them like paparazzi.
But clients don’t know, or care, anything about advertising agencies.
So what we have to do is the equivalent of getting Johnny Depp to pick us out of a crowd of adoring fans, ask us for a date, and then in four week’s time ask us to marry him.”
Immediately she moved it away from the simple mechanical world of solutions that all the men understood, into the world of seduction and relationships that women understood.
Of course everyone was riveted.
To show what clients thought of ad agencies she put up a slide of Hugh Hefner and his Playboy Bunnies.
She said “Clients see us just like this. We may think we’re fabulous, but to them we all look identical.”
Then she said one of the most important parts was deciding how committed we were before the process started.
Did you really, really want the account?
And she put up a picture of Tom Cruise.
She said, “You may initially find someone attractive, but do you really want to get into a long term relationship with someone who jumps up and down on Oprah’s sofa?”
Then she talked about the various stages of the process.
She said the chemistry meeting was like the first date.
She put up a picture of a pouting Jordan and said, “Don’t be needy. Don’t keep talking about yourself: how famous you are and what you’ve done. How boring is that on a first date? Talk about them, find out what they want.”
Then she talked about the tissue meeting.
She said the tissue meeting is like the first weekend away.
And she put up a photo of a woman shaving her legs and a man sitting on the toilet.
She said, “On the first weekend away together, don’t leave the toilet door open, don’t shave your legs. You don’t need to let them know all the less attractive parts about you. That’s too much information.”
And Helen went through the whole pitch process like that.
Not just for the rational side of the brain, but to let her audience know how it feels.
But I’m a bloke, and I’m a creative.
So the two tips that resonated with me were the ones where the headline played off the visual, like a really good ad.
She had a picture of Camilla Parker Bowles and the headline “Never Underestimate The Competition.”
Like a really good ad, it takes you a minute to get it.
So that, when you do, it sinks in.
She gave the example of MCBD being beaten by a big, dull, old agency that they hadn’t taken seriously as a rival.
Then she showed a picture of Anne Widdecombe with the headline “Being Right Isn’t The Same As Being Irresistible”.
This really resonated with me.
All creatives think if we get the ‘right’ answer, as far as the consumer’s concerned, the client must buy our solution.
But in a pitch the consumer isn’t the target market.
In a pitch the client is the target market.
So the right answer may not be the ‘right’ answer.
What Martin did was take us through the pitch process in a way we could understand.
What Helen did was take everyone though the process in a way everyone could empathise with.
And that’s why she’s the most successful new business person in London.
Because she knows feelings are more important than facts.
As she and Martin both said:
If a client like a particular agency, they’ll make the facts fit that feeling.
If a client doesn’t like a particular agency, they’ll make the facts fit that feeling.

Or, as the philosopher David Hume said, “Reason is the slave of the passions.”

Pitchcoach recommends…

Most weeks my posts are prompted by a ‘live’ pitch that made the news.   A politician sounding important, celebrities being self important,  footballers over the moon or important business folk defending their bonuses.  This week, rightly, the news has been dominated by Chile!

In the absence of stories, and at risk of losing loyal followers, my recommendation is a visit to www.speakingaboutpresenting.com

Of all the countless blogs on the subject this one by Olivia Mitchell is among the best. The writing is concise and clear with excellent practical and useable advice. Many of them adopt the classic ‘how to’ format. Some of my favourites:

How to Look Authoritative when you feel anything but.

How to stop information overload.

How to stop worrying about forgetting what you want to say.

How Obama could eliminate his ums (and so could you).

How to stop waffling once and for all.

On that note, enough from me….